Some
Little Faults in the administration of
Education
Starting
today, I am going to have exactly 11 months of service in teaching English. I
have a lot of experiences being a professional working under local
circumstances but that do not mean I am so well-versed in the business. Until
now, after 35 years being an English teacher, I finally come to a verdict that
I am not that compatible for the local education climate or scenario.
The
Malaysian Education System may have been misinterpreted or rather not carried
out with integrity. So, with that in mind, I shall be treating myself as the
point of reference for the success of my my business; a teacher who is teaching
A-level English.
So,
let me put the whole thing in perspective. To me, the most critical aspects of
teaching and learning English are firstly,
teaching or you may call it informing and guiding, next is evaluating
and finally , remedial. Not a few teachers who find themselves unable to give
proper treatment to these three vital criteria.
I
would say teaching is an extremely serious business. A teacher, poor soul; who
wants to start a lesson will have to consider some vital factors so that the
objective of the lesson is achieved. The lesson is designed based on the
students’ ability, previous knowledge and generation of learning materials. I
have found that lack of relevant materials following the lesson is a major
drawback in achieving my objective.
There
shouldn’t be a pause in material supply in follow-up lessons. Well, I do see quite
a few teachers who struggle to prepare materials for both teaching and
evaluating. I feel that the materials should be prepared earlier, based on the
annual and weekly lesson plan. Materials for follow-up activities will enable a
smooth teaching and learning course.
Why
am I mentioning and stressing on all these? Well, there are people who are
leading the teachers by pushing some stuffs into their (the teachers’) mouths. There are extra work-loads
to be done; the technical things. If the
teachers have so much time filling up forms and preparing documents (like
headcounts and strategic plans) for the ‘showing-off’ in meetings, why then
they (the teachers) find themselves caught between the core business and the
technical queues? The teachers should indulge in their real business, not
scratching peoples backs and in the end only to find that will be no one to
scratch theirs (the teachers themselves).
Why
has technical documentation become the main event in teaching and learning?
Since when does this shift in paradigm bugged the teachers. Come on! The
administration could employ others to prepare these technical stuffs and by all
means, leave the teachers with their reflective business.
No comments:
Post a Comment